Recent Release|28 September 2022

Achieving data-led innovation for the modern supply chain

Thought Leadership Team
Thought Leadership Team
Oxford Economics
Achieving data-led innovation for the modern supply chain

A persistent pandemic, economic uncertainty, and a global geopolitical conflict continue to dominate headlines and fuel Chief Supply Chain Officer (CSCO) frustrations. Navigating uncertainties—and managing supply chain challenges accordingly—has out of necessity become a top business priority for boards and C-suites alike.

As sustainability concerns escalate and extreme weather conditions are more frequent, this generation of business leaders is facing an extraordinary situation. A heightened emphasis on supply chain functionalities and roles gives CSCOs the expertise, latitude, and authority to innovate into a data-led future. And Innovators will take supply chains from “now” to “next.”

In cooperation with the IBM Institute for Business Value, Oxford Economics surveyed 1,500 CSCOs and COOs from 35+ countries and 24 industries as part of the 26th edition of IBM’s C-suite Series. All respondents identified themselves as the most senior executive responsible for supply chain operations. To simplify, we refer to the full population as CSCOs.

The project’s purpose was to implement an in-depth analysis on how the 1,500 respondents characterise their investments in supply chain automation. What are their focused priorities and anticipated outcomes? Representing 20% of the respondents, one data-driven, transformative group of CSCOs emerged: the Innovators. These leaders adopt a data-driven approach that emphasises four tech-enabled areas:

About the team

Our Thought Leadership team produces original, evidence-based research made accessible to decision-makers and opinion leaders. Principals for this project included:

Tom Ehrbar

Senior Editor, Thought Leadership

  • Share:

You might be interested in

AI Geopolitics 2030

AI Geopolitics 2030

The first KPMG Strategic AI Capability Index (SACI) provides a comparative, evidence-based assessment of how the world’s leading regions in the race for AI leadership (the United States, Europe, and China) are positioned to develop, scale, and govern artificial intelligence. The analysis is complemented by a detailed view of Europe’s internal sub-regions.
Davos 2026 Debrief: AI competitiveness hinges on scale and sovereignty

Davos 2026 Debrief: AI competitiveness hinges on scale and sovereignty

As heads of state at the World Economic Forum in Davos last Tuesday focused on geopolitics, business leaders at the nearby AI House were speaking about separate yet interwoven imperatives: AI scalability and sovereignty.
Japan’s digital paradox: Why SMEs are the missing link to its next wave of growth

Japan’s digital paradox: Why SMEs are the missing link to its next wave of growth

Japan is famous for its bullet trains, robots, and precision manufacturing, but step into many offices and you’ll find paper forms, hanko stamps, and a fax machine.
Are humanoid robots creepy?

Are humanoid robots creepy?

Some very smart people are betting that machines shaped like humans will do much of our household and factory work for us in the near-ish future. But hurdles remain.