Recent Release | 07 Jun 2023
Multilateral Development Banks for Global Public Goods
Economic Consulting Team
Oxford Economics
The global challenges of today are transboundary and pose existential risks for our societies and economies – including climate change, biodiversity loss, pandemics, fragility, violence and conflict. In our new flagship report ‘Multilateral Development Banks for Global Public Goods’, commissioned by Deutsche Gesellschaft für Internationale Zusammenarbeit (GIZ) on behalf of the German Federal Ministry for Economic Cooperation and Development (BMZ), we show how the World Bank and other Multilateral Development Banks can play a key role in preventing and addressing these crises by supporting the provision and protection of Global Public Goods.
The Covid-19 pandemic and the interventions launched to contain its spread have thrown a sharp spotlight on the critical relevance of Global Public Goods (GPGs). Its devasting impact showed once again that global catastrophes such as the climate crisis or the global credit crunch can only be solved or prevented by concerted global action. This calls for multilateral development banks (MDB) and other multinational organisations to take on a more central role.
While emerging economies and developing countries are often hit hardest by global crises, they also play a key role in achieving the goals that the world has set itself to deal with these shocks. This means that as the leading global development institution, the World Bank can play a key role in preventing these crises by supporting the provision and protection of GPGs in its client countries.
On behalf of the Deutsche Gesellschaft für Internationale Zusammenarbeit (GIZ) GmbH, Oxford Economics analysed how MDBs—and especially the World Bank—could foster the provision and protection of GPGs. The recommendations we provide are based on a clear-cut definition of the economic problem that GPGs face: their structural underprovision stems from the fact that an often sizeable part of the benefits delivered by the provision of GPGs benefits other countries rather than the country providing them.
The implication of what economists call cross-country externalities is that the provision of GPGs cannot be left to the market or individual countries and that MDBs and other multilateral organisations must take on a more central, coordinating role.
The expert behind the research
Our economic consulting team are world leaders in quantitative economic analysis, working with clients around the globe and across sectors to build models, forecast markets and evaluate interventions using state-of-the art techniques. The lead consultant on this project was:
Johanna Neuhoff
Associate Director of Economic Consulting, Continental Europe
Hannah Zick
Economist, Economic Impact
Tags:
You might also be interested in
The Green Leap – Project bankability takes centre stage
The report argues that enhancing project bankability should become a main policy priority as part of climate investment endeavors.
Find Out More
What does the critical minerals boom mean for Africa? | Greenomics podcast
As demand grows for critical minerals like cobalt, copper, and lithium, African nations are navigating opportunities and risks—from boosting local employment to managing geopolitical tensions and environmental concerns.
Find Out More
Toward a global carbon pricing system
Fragmented carbon markets and the risk of carbon leakage are jeopardizing progress toward global net-zero targets. A major challenge lies in the lack of coordinated policies to align around a unified carbon price. Oxford Economics, in a study for the Hinrich Foundation, highlights how regional carbon markets could offer a practical path toward more effective global pricing.
Find Out More
Trump 2.0: US climate policy in retreat
From executive orders to federal lawsuits against state-level climate policies, the Trump administration has acted with urgency to reverse the low-carbon momentum built under President Biden.
Find Out More